1999 Workforce Development Assessment


 

The local economy

A recent study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has identified economic foundations that are associated with economic competitiveness (Rondinelli, et al., 1998):

  • Human resources
  • Technology resources
  • Financial capital
  • Business climate/regulatory climate
  • Physical infrastructure
  • Quality of life/environmental quality
  • Social equity

The Austin/Travis County community has been relatively strong in each of these areas. (Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce, Apr 1998). In particular, Austin holds a comparative advantage with its highly educated workforce (human resources). Also, Austin has a significant concentration of scientists, engineers, and research and development activities (technology resources). The level of venture capital investment has increased steadily (financial capital). Additionally, the quality of life in our community is often noted as a draw for new business.

Building upon these foundations, our community has moved through three major economic stages, and is now moving into a fourth (Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce, Apr 1998).

Today Travis County and the Austin metropolitan area have a thriving economy characterized by solid and consistent employment growth during the last 5-8 years. A few indicators of the current health of the economy are:

  • Continued job growth
  • Low overall unemployment rates
  • Continued population growth
  • Increase in per capita personal income
  • Increase in tax bases and tax revenues
  • Increase in residential and commercial construction
  • Increase in retail sales
  • (CAWDB, 1999)

Also, venture capital funding has reached record high levels: over $164.5 million in 1997, which climbed to over $206.8 million in 1998 (Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce, 1998).

Return to Top of Page

Growth industries.

All industries (except for the federal government) in the Austin-San Marcos MSA have experienced increases in employment from 1994 to 1998. The Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce predicts a 4.0% job growth rate for Austin in 1999 and a 3.5% growth rate in year 2000 (Austin American-Statesman, Mar 11,1996). Projections indicate that future growth will be driven by continued strength in three interrelated "core clusters": semiconductors and electronics, computers and peripherals, and software.

Five emerging industries also have the potential to become core clusters:

  • Logistics and distribution (both transportation planning and management and the flow of goods and information)
  • Biomedical products (manufacture of products for medical use, ranging from pharmaceuticals to orthopedic implants and hearing aids)
  • Film and music (independent film, video and music, as well as clubs and other music venues)
  • Multimedia (CD-ROM and video game software development as well as internet software firms)
  • Transaction services (firms engaged in providing information to consumers and executing transactions via communications networks such as telephone or internet)

These clusters represent families of related industries that are resilient and dynamic. Clusters create self-generating economic activity that attracts both capital and labor, ensuring long term, sustainable development.

Government, education, retail, and other service sectors will continue to remain strong (see Table 2 below). These "sectors" differ from the "clusters" described above in that they provide substantial job opportunities, but add less new wealth to the economy.

Table 2

Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment for Austin-San Marcos Metropolitan Statistical Area

 

1994

 

1995

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

Percent Change 1994- 1998

Mining

1,000

1,100

1,100

1,200

1,300

30.0%

Construction

22,000

24,700

27,700

29,600

33,200

50.9%

Manufacturing
Durable Goods

51,600

56,900

61,200

63,600

64,800

25.6%

Nondurable Goods

11,600

11,800

11,900

12,100

12,400

6.9%

Transportation & Public Utilities

15,000

16,200

17,600

18,600

19,700

31.3%

Wholesale and Retail Trade

102,000

110,000

115,700

121,300

127,200

24.7%

Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate

27,300

28,000

28,900

29,800

30,600

12.1%

Services

129,300

140,300

151,000

161,500

171,400

32.6%

Government
Federal

10,900

11,100

10,300

10,000

9,400

-13.8%

State

64,000

64,900

62,800

63,600

64,400

0.6%

Local

49,900

51,700

52,300

53,900

55,900

12.0%

Total Jobs

484,600

516,600

540,900

565,500

590,300

21.8%

Note. Yearly figures are averages of monthly figures. Total jobs in a year may not add to the sum of the jobs in each sector due to rounding. The 1998 figures use preliminary estimates for December and are subject to revision.

Source. Texas Workforce Commission, Labor Market Information Department, "Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment for Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas- December 1998".

The leading industries with the largest growth rates from 1994-1998 were construction (50.9%), services (32.6%), transportation and public utilities (31.3%), mining (30%), and durable goods manufacturing (25.6%).

Among the services industries, business services have experienced a high rate of growth. For example, employment agencies and temporary help services have tripled in the number of jobs statewide from 1987 to 1997 (Fiscal Notes, Oct 1998). Within Austin, the number of individuals employed by temporary help services increased 41% between 1996 and 1997 (Austin Business Journal, Dec 1998). This trend bears monitoring since increased levels of temporary employment may be a precursor to a less stable workforce.

The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) reports that "high-tech manufacturing has added some diversity to an economy that is somewhat dependent on government employment& this slight re-distribution of employment is a positive sign that employment volatility in this area is declining" (TWC, Mar 1998).

Figure 1

Major Employers in Austin-San Marcos MSA - 1998

Source: Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce: Quick Facts Reference. Based on the top 40 employers in Austin.

Return to Top of Page

Threats to economic prosperity. The Austin economy is booming and the future looks good, so why should the community be concerned about workforce development? One prime reason is that the job growth rate is exceeding the current labor supply. For example:

  • Sixty percent of high-tech firms reported difficulty finding employees, primarily engineers, programmers, and assemblers/machinists. Many companies (31%) cited the labor shortage as a major barrier for continued growth (Fiscal Notes, Aug 1998).
  • Industries that have traditionally been labor-intensive and required few advanced skills are increasing their use of technology. One example is McDonalds new computerized food ordering system (Fiscal Notes, Aug 1998).
  • Small businesses in Austin have been impacted by the tight labor market and are expanding the variety of resources they use to attract and locate workers. Many of these small businesses cannot afford to offer attractive salaries (Austin Business Journal, Feb/Mar 1999).
  • Continued demands for new residential construction is creating a shortage of skilled, experienced construction laborers. The Texas Association of Builders (TAB) has requested that the state put more funding into trade schools and into promoting apprenticeships in electrical, contracting, plumbing, and carpentry (Fiscal Notes, Nov/Dec 1998).

Return to Top of Page

Summary

Although the economic foundations of our community remain strong, in order for businesses in Austin to continue to maintain its current status and expand, a skilled, trained, consistent labor supply must be provided. There exists an opportunity for corporations, businesses, and public employers in Austin to tap a historically under-utilized workforce in the community. This small population of workers currently does not share in the prosperity that Austin is experiencing. The majority of this population is motivated and hard working, but must overcome factors and barriers beyond their control (lack of basic skills including workplace readiness, lack of resources to access training, family demands, lack of access). These barriers have kept them from obtaining the education and skills they need to contribute to and participate in our communitys prosperity.

Return to Top of Page

Assessment Home